Skip to main content

PSU bank mergers get the go-ahead from Union Cabinet

With cabinet approving the ministerial panel, the proposed merger of PSBs moves ever closer. FM Arun Jaitley, who will head the panel, outlined that the objective would be to create strong banks. To better understand this vague goal, we must first define what a strong bank should be and then determine if merger has any merit. 

Keeping with times, let us drop any pro people sentiments and analyze the situation from purely a business perspective; in hope that it may help us perceive the government’s rationale, if any exist. A strong bank, or any business for that matter, would be one that is able to meet the market's demand, with the most efficient and appropriate productive processes extracting maximum profit. The modern market, post the 80s, has moved away from the towering economies of scale that characterized the fordist era. Demand, including the demand for credit, is highly diversified and is met by flexibility in supply. This is not to say that mega entities are non-existent but their emergence and continued existence is based on careful assessment and adaption to market forces. An ad-hoc creation of mammoth entities, like the government’s drive to create 5 super banks from the existing PSBs, cannot be characterized as market motivated. Not to say that the post merger banks will be absolutely unable to meet demand, but their high degree of centralization and massive overheads will make the process inefficient, which coincidentally is the core critique of the public sector.

This merger constitutes a systematic step towards sabotaging public banking by making it unwieldy and cumbersome in its response to Indian credit needs and private sector competition. The resultant poor PSB performances caused by organizational inflexibility and overhead over-burden would then be used as grounds to divest and privatize. When these banks are eventually acquired by private parties, a large portion of which will be foreign in origin, rest assured that the gargantuan organizational structures currently envisaged will be dismantled on the basis of flexibility and efficiency. 

The merger is an exercise in futility, at least from the perspective of improving PSB performances and the government is well aware of this fact. However, as the end game is to privatize Indian banking, depriving the population temporarily of robust credit mechanisms is unfortunately considered a small price to pay.

The news could be read here.


Popular posts from this blog

GST – Impact on Small Industry and the Informal Sector

The Goods and Services Tax (GST), that came into effect on 1st July, 2017, has been lauded as the most comprehensive contemporary reform of Indian indirect taxation. Aimed at creating a common, unified and integrated domestic market, allowing the free flow of goods and services across state lines, GST is supposed to deliver Indian industry and thereby the economy the competitive edge apparently lacking till now.
Reality is however a far cry from the picture painted by government. GST by creating platform a conducive to economies of scale and nullifying regional tariffs, is both conceptually and practically advantageous to big business and detrimental to the informal sector and small businesses.
These groupings, informal and small, though quite different have some degree of overlap. Informal business is overwhelmingly small but not all small businesses are informal. GST’s impact on these groups is quite different both with regard to extent of impact or in terms of results sought.
Small Bu…

Why Should Modinomics Be Bestowed With An Ignoble Prize In Economics? Demonetization’s Spectacular Failure.

This lesson from history is quite well known: Muhammad bin Tughlaq thought that may be if he could find an alternative currency, he could save some money. So he replaced the Gold and Silver coins with copper currency. Local goldsmiths started manufacturing these coins and which led to a loss of a huge sum of money to the court. He had to take his orders back and reissue Gold/Silver coins against those copper coins. This counter decision was far more devastating as people exchanged all their fake currency and emptied royal treasure. And nothing seems to have changed ideatically even after close to 800 years since, when another bold and bald move or rather a balderdash move by the Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi launched his version of the lunacy. Throw in Demonetization and flush out black money. Well, that was the reason promulgated along with a host of other nationalistic-sounding derivatives like curbing terror funding, expanding the tax net, open to embracing digital economy an…

Weekly Digest (Economics, Finance and Banking) 2 August - 8 August 2016 GST SPECIAL


Capital tends to liberate itself from dependence on the human contribution. That’s why essentially alltechnology is substitutive (imitative). The fraction of the global population capable of making any contribution of non-near-zero value today is no greater than 20% (Damned lies statistics!!). Politics fills the gap with bureaucratic bloat and other make-work, welfare, a variety of protectionisms, macroeconomic junky-stimulus … and the gulf it needs to fill yawns open further every year. Sunny-side up (old-style) liberalism promotes 'The Process' (which is great). If it seriously expects to maintain the narrative that there is a continuous historical trend in which (dysgenically deteriorating) human populations will always find a useful place, it is deeply in denial. Massive swathes of the core industrial infrastructure are already close to laborless. The proletariat was a phase. Socialists have nothing correct and interesting to say on this (like most) issues; they have …