Skip to main content

'When people are suffering, how can you call it a good cause?' -- C H Venkatachalam, GS, AIBEA

An interesting interview with CH Venkatachalam, General Secretary of All India Bank Employee Association (AIBEA) on the issue of Demonetisation. Though a couple of days old, this could not have been missed. He says in a response to a question:

What do you think is the rationale behind bringing in a denomination higher than Rs 1,000?

It is illogical. Removing Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes and bringing in Rs 2,000 notes does not make sense at all. It is easier to hoard again.

Black money transactions are always done in higher denomination. Now, people will accumulate the Rs 2,000 notes.

Why do you have to come out with a Rs 2,000 note when you are demonetising higher currencies?....

What is really the interesting pat here is the absence of mentioning purchasing power of the Rupee if higher denominations were junked. It should be noted that the purchasing power of the rupee had gone down considerably since 1978, when high value notes were junked. The value of Rs 1,000 in 1998, compared to the movement of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) taking 1982 as the base year, was only Rs 160. This meant the average consumer now needed notes of a higher face value for normal cash transactions. This and taking into account the fact that other methods of payment were yet to take root was why the government had, in the public interest, re-introduced the Rs 1,000 note during the AB Vajpayee regime. Maybe, the same logic has been applied here in releasing INR 2000 currency note.


Popular posts from this blog

GST – Impact on Small Industry and the Informal Sector

The Goods and Services Tax (GST), that came into effect on 1st July, 2017, has been lauded as the most comprehensive contemporary reform of Indian indirect taxation. Aimed at creating a common, unified and integrated domestic market, allowing the free flow of goods and services across state lines, GST is supposed to deliver Indian industry and thereby the economy the competitive edge apparently lacking till now.
Reality is however a far cry from the picture painted by government. GST by creating platform a conducive to economies of scale and nullifying regional tariffs, is both conceptually and practically advantageous to big business and detrimental to the informal sector and small businesses.
These groupings, informal and small, though quite different have some degree of overlap. Informal business is overwhelmingly small but not all small businesses are informal. GST’s impact on these groups is quite different both with regard to extent of impact or in terms of results sought.
Small Bu…

Why Should Modinomics Be Bestowed With An Ignoble Prize In Economics? Demonetization’s Spectacular Failure.

This lesson from history is quite well known: Muhammad bin Tughlaq thought that may be if he could find an alternative currency, he could save some money. So he replaced the Gold and Silver coins with copper currency. Local goldsmiths started manufacturing these coins and which led to a loss of a huge sum of money to the court. He had to take his orders back and reissue Gold/Silver coins against those copper coins. This counter decision was far more devastating as people exchanged all their fake currency and emptied royal treasure. And nothing seems to have changed ideatically even after close to 800 years since, when another bold and bald move or rather a balderdash move by the Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi launched his version of the lunacy. Throw in Demonetization and flush out black money. Well, that was the reason promulgated along with a host of other nationalistic-sounding derivatives like curbing terror funding, expanding the tax net, open to embracing digital economy an…

Weekly Digest (Economics, Finance and Banking) 2 August - 8 August 2016 GST SPECIAL


Capital tends to liberate itself from dependence on the human contribution. That’s why essentially alltechnology is substitutive (imitative). The fraction of the global population capable of making any contribution of non-near-zero value today is no greater than 20% (Damned lies statistics!!). Politics fills the gap with bureaucratic bloat and other make-work, welfare, a variety of protectionisms, macroeconomic junky-stimulus … and the gulf it needs to fill yawns open further every year. Sunny-side up (old-style) liberalism promotes 'The Process' (which is great). If it seriously expects to maintain the narrative that there is a continuous historical trend in which (dysgenically deteriorating) human populations will always find a useful place, it is deeply in denial. Massive swathes of the core industrial infrastructure are already close to laborless. The proletariat was a phase. Socialists have nothing correct and interesting to say on this (like most) issues; they have …